Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-20 17:36:29 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F0BD67901F822394CEF350ECC3A72D5DBF2C5E8A1BC44565AE9DAF36FAE050A
Participant Details

Original Note:

In addition to the other notes on this tweet about the timing being misconstrued to be about the U.S. when this article is actually about Swiss airline EasyJet, it is notable that the 'expert' cited in this article has also been critiqued numerous times for Covid-19 alarmism: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/01/china-coronavirus-twitter/605644/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1516799935412416514
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6F0BD67901F822394CEF350ECC3A72D5DBF2C5E8A1BC44565AE9DAF36FAE050A
createdAtMillis - 1650476189863
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 15167999354124165146F0BD67901F822394CEF350ECC3A72D5DBF2C5E8A1BC44565AE9DAF36FAE050A