Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-20 17:36:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F0A01ACCEC3451D3FEFC0D9848CF0889D513ABB59EDE223E2DF53210BC2C999
Participant Details

Original Note:

In addition to the other notes on this tweet about the timing being misconstrued to be about the U.S. when this article is actually about Swiss airline EasyJet, it is notable that the 'expert' cited in this article has also been critiqued numerous times for Covid-19 alarmism: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/01/china-coronavirus-twitter/605644/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1516799935412416514
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4F0A01ACCEC3451D3FEFC0D9848CF0889D513ABB59EDE223E2DF53210BC2C999
createdAtMillis - 1650476190105
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 15167999354124165144F0A01ACCEC3451D3FEFC0D9848CF0889D513ABB59EDE223E2DF53210BC2C999