Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-20 01:23:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F615C9819B3C14EC31E5CE410A93179C0372A8BAF5FE2EB1FD0CD4794F368D2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is a lot of controversy about this topic. The "personal information" was put into the whois database intentionally, making it public. It was made public by its owner. Pointing out that it is already online hasn't revealed anything "private".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1516495510651109377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F615C9819B3C14EC31E5CE410A93179C0372A8BAF5FE2EB1FD0CD4794F368D2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1650417812712
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1516495510651109377F615C9819B3C14EC31E5CE410A93179C0372A8BAF5FE2EB1FD0CD4794F368D2A