Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-20 17:17:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2E466F49556DD9A1A5E8738188EC641E75FA152A4AD610C7EBCD29B9F29D0C7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is a lot of controversy about this topic. The "personal information" was put into the whois database intentionally, making it public. It was made public by its owner. Pointing out that it is already online hasn't revealed anything "private".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1516495510651109377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2E466F49556DD9A1A5E8738188EC641E75FA152A4AD610C7EBCD29B9F29D0C7F
  • createdAtMillis - 1650475022824
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15164955106511093772E466F49556DD9A1A5E8738188EC641E75FA152A4AD610C7EBCD29B9F29D0C7F