Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-03-13 03:11:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FFC7D2B4C6DCD264BE31D868A3F8E83C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first author of the paper replied to this tweet stating that, not only is the paper an unpiublished abstract, but it also lacks enough strong evidence to determine any conclusion. https://twitter.com/aesbrah/status/1501075886539423748?s=21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1502787233509642242
  • participantId - FFC7D2B4C6DCD264BE31D868A3F8E83C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1647141071515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1502787233509642242FFC7D2B4C6DCD264BE31D868A3F8E83C