Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-03-15 01:43:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6D8570EA30CC748BC3298F1B0EE05F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first author of the paper replied to this tweet stating that, not only is the paper an unpiublished abstract, but it also lacks enough strong evidence to determine any conclusion. https://twitter.com/aesbrah/status/1501075886539423748?s=21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1502787233509642242
  • participantId - F6D8570EA30CC748BC3298F1B0EE05F5
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1647308626149
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1502787233509642242F6D8570EA30CC748BC3298F1B0EE05F5