Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-19 07:25:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first author of the paper replied to this tweet stating that, not only is the paper an unpiublished abstract, but it also lacks enough strong evidence to determine any conclusion. https://twitter.com/aesbrah/status/1501075886539423748?s=21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1502787233509642242
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745
  • createdAtMillis - 1655623522954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1502787233509642242676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745