Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-03-02 02:40:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 76D75596753AC43955A8B72188F1AE7C4CF088C9E942575E0B1D7D9F8BC2FF79
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper studies a single workplace with eight participating coworkers. It's irresponsible to present it as applicable to any places other than those studied. The journal which published it has been described as predatory and lacking in academic rigour. https://academic.oup.com/rev/article/30/3/405/6348133?login=false#

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1498806591159771144
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 76D75596753AC43955A8B72188F1AE7C4CF088C9E942575E0B1D7D9F8BC2FF79
  • createdAtMillis - 1646188830892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 149880659115977114476D75596753AC43955A8B72188F1AE7C4CF088C9E942575E0B1D7D9F8BC2FF79