Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-01-30 22:46:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9795BF8962792425EFA8D2F4F92685B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper is not published by the NIH - it has only been indexed by the NIH in their PubMed search engine. The article itself is from India. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/about/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34975139/ This article is a review of 7 past studies. But past studies have been shown to be unreliable. 5 of these 7 aren’t even randomized. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1487793187347472387
  • participantId - 9795BF8962792425EFA8D2F4F92685B4
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1643582813125
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14877931873474723879795BF8962792425EFA8D2F4F92685B4