Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-01-25 19:57:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAC8E21BED07F6C747565A276F737056F1954A15A7607C04E52D50B14B013AB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is in fact free speech by any definition. Because you don’t like it is precisely the reason it is protected. If everyone agreed, we would not need the first amendment. https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1486026014811693056
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAC8E21BED07F6C747565A276F737056F1954A15A7607C04E52D50B14B013AB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1643140660092
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1486026014811693056DAC8E21BED07F6C747565A276F737056F1954A15A7607C04E52D50B14B013AB6