Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-01-20 16:24:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C367BEEF0F1FFF29CB5368C2074CB9747CD3E11552D99392DFC23CE27F025CAD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tucker Carlson Tonight is opinion and does no "reporting". Defending against a defamation suit, Fox lawyers argued that Carlson's statements on his show were "constitutionally protected opinion commentary [...] and are not reasonably understood as being factual." https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv11161/527808/39/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1483860984452235267
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C367BEEF0F1FFF29CB5368C2074CB9747CD3E11552D99392DFC23CE27F025CAD
  • createdAtMillis - 1642695860181
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1483860984452235267C367BEEF0F1FFF29CB5368C2074CB9747CD3E11552D99392DFC23CE27F025CAD