Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-01-04 18:18:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DEA5AD2007DE23B094686356D7F5C86C1251EB9F97EF086CB7047E8CAD13B4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence for this claim, and the claim is impossibly broad. The author then tries to shut down conversation by saying that only people who have tried this (potentially dangerous) approach can argue.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1478403606806249476
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DEA5AD2007DE23B094686356D7F5C86C1251EB9F97EF086CB7047E8CAD13B4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1641320315233
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14784036068062494764DEA5AD2007DE23B094686356D7F5C86C1251EB9F97EF086CB7047E8CAD13B4A