Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-12-07 16:20:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0886B3B3AF4EEE4341DAEF6F1B4F224048E828DDBC8B626F0EAD68E609AFF0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not actually a peer-reviewed study, but simply an abstract with no data or methodology shown. The AHA has issued an Expression of Concern: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001051

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1468181153404358657
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0886B3B3AF4EEE4341DAEF6F1B4F224048E828DDBC8B626F0EAD68E609AFF0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1638894059796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1468181153404358657B0886B3B3AF4EEE4341DAEF6F1B4F224048E828DDBC8B626F0EAD68E609AFF0E