Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-12-04 17:28:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE595D7DC4124AC4168467809E44E56E02F7238AE280189FC8918435AE47F45F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The link is to an abstract and not the full study. Of concern: Typos in the abstract; not peer reviewed, small sample size and wide age range. 566 is not a large sample and ages are from 28 -97 with no indication of risk by age or cardiac diagnosis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1467146207097237508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE595D7DC4124AC4168467809E44E56E02F7238AE280189FC8918435AE47F45F
  • createdAtMillis - 1638638921945
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1467146207097237508CE595D7DC4124AC4168467809E44E56E02F7238AE280189FC8918435AE47F45F