Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-12-03 04:30:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF07F60282EF7E69054F7C986F0F96D16613F2218CCF5BC85258A5A06F9B8B32
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ruffin points to the context of the BLM protest at which Rittenhouse fired shots to support the claim of racism. She frames the acquittal not addressing this context as evidence of systemic racism. These opinions are protected speech, per New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1462094661309317131
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF07F60282EF7E69054F7C986F0F96D16613F2218CCF5BC85258A5A06F9B8B32
  • createdAtMillis - 1638505809563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1462094661309317131BF07F60282EF7E69054F7C986F0F96D16613F2218CCF5BC85258A5A06F9B8B32