Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-21 16:35:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4A2C9C976AE3C55A4E6CAE11A70A2BC7D9EC53C6CF2B4F3CA4A629EA1280E5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ruffin points to the context of the BLM protest at which Rittenhouse fired shots to support the claim of racism. She frames the acquittal not addressing this context as evidence of systemic racism. These opinions are protected speech, per New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1462094661309317131
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4A2C9C976AE3C55A4E6CAE11A70A2BC7D9EC53C6CF2B4F3CA4A629EA1280E5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1637512536938
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1462094661309317131B4A2C9C976AE3C55A4E6CAE11A70A2BC7D9EC53C6CF2B4F3CA4A629EA1280E5A