Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-20 16:29:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35D6A1B8D2E6B0393A1734F1D95D04F550D55A62B3C4EC0989226A735E02B784
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ruffin points to the context of the BLM protest at which Rittenhouse fired shots to support the claim of racism. She frames the acquittal not addressing this context as evidence of systemic racism. These opinions are protected speech, per New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1462094661309317131
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35D6A1B8D2E6B0393A1734F1D95D04F550D55A62B3C4EC0989226A735E02B784
  • createdAtMillis - 1637425784383
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 146209466130931713135D6A1B8D2E6B0393A1734F1D95D04F550D55A62B3C4EC0989226A735E02B784