Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-21 21:35:25 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 249D2CF9EBD401C4C7BB7ED631C09F9CB038D5E5182514558D5CBC7845EE705B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ruffin points to the context of the BLM protest at which Rittenhouse fired shots to support the claim of racism. She frames the acquittal not addressing this context as evidence of systemic racism. These opinions are protected speech, per New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1462094661309317131
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 249D2CF9EBD401C4C7BB7ED631C09F9CB038D5E5182514558D5CBC7845EE705B
  • createdAtMillis - 1637530525345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1462094661309317131249D2CF9EBD401C4C7BB7ED631C09F9CB038D5E5182514558D5CBC7845EE705B