Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-21 05:01:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE755B02D5DCEB5B24E4A0AAB6A542B0D3D08CD68E16AD805FE543B6CD10DCB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a contentious trial. Watching it led to lots commentary on the fairness of the trial. The judge was clearly biased. The jury was all white. Justice was not unbiased.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1462060888442220546
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE755B02D5DCEB5B24E4A0AAB6A542B0D3D08CD68E16AD805FE543B6CD10DCB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1637470904327
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1462060888442220546DE755B02D5DCEB5B24E4A0AAB6A542B0D3D08CD68E16AD805FE543B6CD10DCB7