Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-07 07:54:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45C058E27ED45C579AE616E3D7346D2F37BA94C81A912448DAE9A00BB2FF464B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a contentious trial. Watching it led to lots commentary on the fairness of the trial. The judge was clearly biased. The jury was all white. Justice was not unbiased.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1462060888442220546
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45C058E27ED45C579AE616E3D7346D2F37BA94C81A912448DAE9A00BB2FF464B
  • createdAtMillis - 1657180457823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 146206088844222054645C058E27ED45C579AE616E3D7346D2F37BA94C81A912448DAE9A00BB2FF464B