Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-21 01:36:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B4DE016128739C355DAEA1EF17F58BBC66AF4E6B89B23097C5AF1756D35DF52
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a contentious trial. Watching it led to lots commentary on the fairness of the trial. The judge was clearly biased. The jury was all white. Justice was not unbiased.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1462060888442220546
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B4DE016128739C355DAEA1EF17F58BBC66AF4E6B89B23097C5AF1756D35DF52
  • createdAtMillis - 1637458613589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14620608884422205460B4DE016128739C355DAEA1EF17F58BBC66AF4E6B89B23097C5AF1756D35DF52