Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-10 06:43:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE0D7C4208488612C2A9B7E9D9E22CE3A8EDF3D7BFD06EE77626A2F7BD2CBAF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

According to both Wikipedia and Google, rigorous skepticism is critical to the Scientific Method. If you can question it, its Science. If you can't question it, its propaganda. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1458198158937399306
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE0D7C4208488612C2A9B7E9D9E22CE3A8EDF3D7BFD06EE77626A2F7BD2CBAF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1636526606791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1458198158937399306EE0D7C4208488612C2A9B7E9D9E22CE3A8EDF3D7BFD06EE77626A2F7BD2CBAF8