Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-04 14:01:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AEC1DA3F6B992C0679BC8F169F2F83C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Poor framing due to missing crucial info: Cynthia Bashant, federal judge: “The context of Maddow’s statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be her opinion... Anything beyond this is Maddow’s opinion or her exaggeration of the facts.“ https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1456252666351259655
  • participantId - AEC1DA3F6B992C0679BC8F169F2F83C5
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1636034509999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1456252666351259655AEC1DA3F6B992C0679BC8F169F2F83C5