Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-10-29 23:34:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 573C68603194953F9BBD1FAEF69E9928F98F22310EE8BA685F64C4637F45941A
Participant Details

Original Note:

A closer look suggests that the implied visual argument may have a few gaps. I hope that a member of the House Intelligence committee looks at real intelligence w a better analytical eye than he does Twitter pictures. https://twitter.com/comfortablysmug/status/1454137262736875522?s=21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1454145945688584201
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 573C68603194953F9BBD1FAEF69E9928F98F22310EE8BA685F64C4637F45941A
  • createdAtMillis - 1635550481472
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1454145945688584201573C68603194953F9BBD1FAEF69E9928F98F22310EE8BA685F64C4637F45941A