Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-10-12 13:16:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 473AF874EB3F317FDAC1425313626363006313AF236C4BCF764AAEEEB23D0B7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Blow here presents rumor as fact, and goes on to make large implications for which there is no evidence and has few credible supporters in science. Context: https://www.science.org/content/article/why-many-scientists-say-unlikely-sars-cov-2-originated-lab-leak https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02596-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1447776635273502723
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 473AF874EB3F317FDAC1425313626363006313AF236C4BCF764AAEEEB23D0B7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1634044611440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1447776635273502723473AF874EB3F317FDAC1425313626363006313AF236C4BCF764AAEEEB23D0B7D