Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-07-16 02:54:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E52787E1BBA04DAC99140265EF71B301208F3D648B6AEE39DC588A15C3E80A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This person provides no proof of his claim, and makes the claim despite many credible sources verifying that there was no fraud in the election https://twitter.com/RecordersOffice/status/1415749790437019649?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1415795823867277320
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E52787E1BBA04DAC99140265EF71B301208F3D648B6AEE39DC588A15C3E80A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1626404072913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14157958238672773207E52787E1BBA04DAC99140265EF71B301208F3D648B6AEE39DC588A15C3E80A5