Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-07-16 12:36:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9FA3618E5EF5961394CD4D435DC2E992A6071E7CE9DA8B0D2776210EB1164CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not proof of election fraud. It was well-understood in the months leading up to the election that absentee voters were more likely to be Democratic voters. There has been no proof of wide-spread fraud in the 2020 election in GA that could effect the results. https://www.ajc.com/politics/some-ballots-initially-double-counted-in-fulton-before-recount/GY4FTEEI6REIJN3SDKIDNIOYV4/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1415730377256181760
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9FA3618E5EF5961394CD4D435DC2E992A6071E7CE9DA8B0D2776210EB1164CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1626439002292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1415730377256181760E9FA3618E5EF5961394CD4D435DC2E992A6071E7CE9DA8B0D2776210EB1164CA