Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-07-02 01:04:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8DB53D34A34BAB7840119E977C3ADB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

There have already been investigations into the incident in question. It's been determined that Babbitt's civil rights were not infringed, and it was reasonable for the officer to believe he was acting in self-defense, and in defense of members of congress and their staff. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/ashli-babbitt-capitol-police-shooting/2021/04/14/452fb414-666a-11eb-886d-5264d4ceb46d_story.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1410700960280702977
  • participantId - B8DB53D34A34BAB7840119E977C3ADB6
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1625187841590
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1410700960280702977B8DB53D34A34BAB7840119E977C3ADB6