Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-06-27 00:18:35 UTC -

Rated by Participant: F119991B3DCAECD19834E94BA7B20D0E563601DAC7E114D19BBB29CDB12C6E02
Participant Details

Original Note:

A judge has ruled that Hill's case had nothing to do with revenge porn and was instead legitimate journalism that was aimed at exposing her corruption, which included both sleeping with staffers and embezzlement. This misrepresents the case to present the abuser as a victim. https://theavtimes.com/2021/04/21/judge-deals-former-av-congresswoman-another-legal-defeat-in-revenge-porn-lawsuit/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1408568560297857031
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F119991B3DCAECD19834E94BA7B20D0E563601DAC7E114D19BBB29CDB12C6E02
  • createdAtMillis - 1624753115468
  • version - 1
  • agree - 1
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1408568560297857031F119991B3DCAECD19834E94BA7B20D0E563601DAC7E114D19BBB29CDB12C6E02