Birdwatch Note Rating
2021-06-26 00:28:16 UTC -
Rated by Participant: 99E1F5AFED5B83E5AAEFEBFB9AFCE4DB7718D49C2BBAE382526716F61E9C4B2C
Participant Details
Original Note:
A judge has ruled that Hill's case had nothing to do with revenge porn and was instead legitimate journalism that was aimed at exposing her corruption, which included both sleeping with staffers and embezzlement. This misrepresents the case to present the abuser as a victim. https://theavtimes.com/2021/04/21/judge-deals-former-av-congresswoman-another-legal-defeat-in-revenge-porn-lawsuit/
All Note Details