Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-06-23 12:56:24 UTC -

Rated by Participant: E4FEC9C3B02EB8B5143C75C0CB5BD2468B31CE2E4EDD1E7A7062CCA35A8C4CAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

It’s self evidently an opinion. A whatabout Birdwatch note calling the tweet “misleading” is nuts and an abuse of Birdwatch, but sadly typical for “fact checking.” E.g., https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fact-checking-facebooks-fact-checkers-11614987375

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1407073231882928134
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4FEC9C3B02EB8B5143C75C0CB5BD2468B31CE2E4EDD1E7A7062CCA35A8C4CAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1624452984988
  • version - 1
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 1
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1407073231882928134E4FEC9C3B02EB8B5143C75C0CB5BD2468B31CE2E4EDD1E7A7062CCA35A8C4CAF