Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-04-19 15:39:19 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 16883715FD48FEA42004A6D89AEBE0321479BB3DCDA20822475D5552A07D26A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author is college sports writer. The 'study' is not done by Stanford University, the journal cited is not scientifically peer reviewed. The whole purpose is to mislead. Stanford U actual article:https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/06/stanford-scientists-contribute-to-who-mask-guidelines.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1384144322765869060
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16883715FD48FEA42004A6D89AEBE0321479BB3DCDA20822475D5552A07D26A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1618846759797
  • version - 1
  • agree - 1
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 1
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 1
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 138414432276586906016883715FD48FEA42004A6D89AEBE0321479BB3DCDA20822475D5552A07D26A0