Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-03-12 04:37:57 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 7DCE8C65C73D8DD992BCA4D237950869148D17B33BF5CB87BAE755CFBFAB165D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Police have no duty to protect anyone and therefore are not a reliable alternative to personal arms. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1370221072914743296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DCE8C65C73D8DD992BCA4D237950869148D17B33BF5CB87BAE755CFBFAB165D
  • createdAtMillis - 1615523877280
  • version - 1
  • agree - 1
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 1
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 1
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 13702210729147432967DCE8C65C73D8DD992BCA4D237950869148D17B33BF5CB87BAE755CFBFAB165D