Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-02-24 12:18:53 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 03272D35B567DF51CA182C4C417D7D3801A41F0E89C5A70CE7D94CA586E9D665
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite having the conclusion deemed without merit or evidence in over a score of courts, Crowder insists that he has proof for fraud. He presents none in the clip, instead diverting focus to “double standards,” in media.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1364461172968275969
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03272D35B567DF51CA182C4C417D7D3801A41F0E89C5A70CE7D94CA586E9D665
  • createdAtMillis - 1614169133897
  • version - 1
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 1
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 1
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 136446117296827596903272D35B567DF51CA182C4C417D7D3801A41F0E89C5A70CE7D94CA586E9D665