Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-02-18 15:14:28 UTC -

Rated by Participant: F35972BBD2F99515FD974E9C7AFD899970F2E4A59115132FAD59EBCB74C0ABE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

These allegations rely on unverified or highly dubious sources. An investigation by the World Bank did not substantiate them: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2019/11/11/world-bank-statement-on-review-of-project-in-xinjiang-china nor have investigative journalists who actually traveled there: https://dailytimes.com.pk/723317/exposing-the-occidents-baseless-lies-about-xinjiang

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1362205944868868098
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F35972BBD2F99515FD974E9C7AFD899970F2E4A59115132FAD59EBCB74C0ABE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1613661268324
  • version - 1
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 1
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 1
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1362205944868868098F35972BBD2F99515FD974E9C7AFD899970F2E4A59115132FAD59EBCB74C0ABE6