Birdwatch Note
2026-02-02 08:45:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The post seems to be accurate depiction of the way this matter has been treated by all parties.
Written by 582843287D1884579D72429E7109FCD069F555DAC9F3E3C54F7415C94F1D0D1C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/2018068911875346740
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 2018244421243093467
- noteId - 2018244421243093467
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 582843287D1884579D72429E7109FCD069F555DAC9F3E3C54F7415C94F1D0D1C
- createdAtMillis - 1770021941849
- tweetId - 2018068911875346740
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The post seems to be accurate depiction of the way this matter has been treated by all parties.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2026-02-02 03:59:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2026-02-02 03:48:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2026-02-02 03:47:57 -0500 | Rating Details |