Birdwatch Note
2026-02-02 06:50:10 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Factually Correct The proposed CN does not challenge any of the numbers cited in the post, which is an admission they are factually correct Speculation about Epstein belongs in the replies
Written by 0DBA64F324DF9433A838FD0245B5D7811B0E167EF4C9F66F83A63B2739F59D83
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/2017686772818591990
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 2018215350458786217
- noteId - 2018215350458786217
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0DBA64F324DF9433A838FD0245B5D7811B0E167EF4C9F66F83A63B2739F59D83
- createdAtMillis - 1770015010834
- tweetId - 2017686772818591990
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN Factually Correct The proposed CN does not challenge any of the numbers cited in the post, which is an admission they are factually correct Speculation about Epstein belongs in the replies