Birdwatch Note
2025-08-27 02:18:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The note as it stands is erroneous. The right information on the spend on rebranding should be 700 million or $700,000,000. But instead the post says $700,000,000 million, which is incorrect. Same goes for the loss in stock value. https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/cracker-barrel-joins-bud-light-target-branding-backfires
Written by 38B6635BF5281A20E3A691FCD873481A7FDD2EF077A2AC04F8D7344717D6DD1E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1960324362906583384
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1960527423792939009
- noteId - 1960527423792939009
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 38B6635BF5281A20E3A691FCD873481A7FDD2EF077A2AC04F8D7344717D6DD1E
- createdAtMillis - 1756261137328
- tweetId - 1960324362906583384
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The note as it stands is erroneous. The right information on the spend on rebranding should be 700 million or $700,000,000. But instead the post says $700,000,000 million, which is incorrect. Same goes for the loss in stock value. https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/cracker-barrel-joins-bud-light-target-branding-backfires
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-08-26 21:30:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 21:30:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 21:54:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 21:38:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 21:33:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 23:35:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 22:25:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-27 03:04:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 22:03:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 23:59:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 23:25:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 22:04:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 22:22:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-27 00:28:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-27 01:29:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-27 10:29:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 23:52:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 23:24:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-27 01:10:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 23:34:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 22:49:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 22:08:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-26 22:18:15 -0500 | Rating Details |