Birdwatch Note
2025-06-06 17:07:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is false. There is no evidence to suggest that Starmer had any connection to Jeffrey Epstein. As such there is no link, as you cannot prove a negative. https://x.com/justdave89now/status/1930902847694033300?s=61&t=NyCcjBL33HFt6eaReJKMYA
Written by 658F165C1F8B7DB9FCDBE120787860767A9D73A8116C152956C4F45077A2C06C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1930729503795429839
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1931035249720348870
- noteId - 1931035249720348870
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 658F165C1F8B7DB9FCDBE120787860767A9D73A8116C152956C4F45077A2C06C
- createdAtMillis - 1749229655090
- tweetId - 1930729503795429839
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is false. There is no evidence to suggest that Starmer had any connection to Jeffrey Epstein. As such there is no link, as you cannot prove a negative. https://x.com/justdave89now/status/1930902847694033300?s=61&t=NyCcjBL33HFt6eaReJKMYA
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-06-06 20:02:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:00:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 22:31:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 15:46:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 12:36:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 12:28:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 16:52:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 15:22:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 17:06:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 14:10:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 15:28:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 14:14:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 12:57:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-07 04:58:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-07 01:31:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 20:22:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:37:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:17:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 12:58:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-07 02:48:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 15:21:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:04:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-07 00:22:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:26:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:15:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 12:42:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 16:32:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:37:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 16:50:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 15:31:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 15:12:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:46:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:13:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 13:00:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 12:46:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 12:33:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 15:41:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-06 14:10:18 -0500 | Rating Details |