Birdwatch Note
2025-05-05 10:07:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The post is factually false. Democrats rejected a policy to increase penalties for soliciting and buying sex from 16- and 17-year-olds. https://apnews.com/article/california-newsom-democrats-sex-trafficking-teens-949787d5eeb1688dba82598156c0e95f
Written by 25C0B463FCD9481E6540EA524EA70679223AC415A85ED3C1CA2676E9A289F0FE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1919330952657895917
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1919333176666706359
- noteId - 1919333176666706359
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 25C0B463FCD9481E6540EA524EA70679223AC415A85ED3C1CA2676E9A289F0FE
- createdAtMillis - 1746439663461
- tweetId - 1919330952657895917
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The post is factually false. Democrats rejected a policy to increase penalties for soliciting and buying sex from 16- and 17-year-olds. https://apnews.com/article/california-newsom-democrats-sex-trafficking-teens-949787d5eeb1688dba82598156c0e95f
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-05-05 21:50:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 18:57:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 18:37:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 17:33:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 16:10:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 13:21:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 06:35:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 05:17:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-06 01:13:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 14:49:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 14:18:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-06 00:30:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 18:50:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 18:02:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 13:00:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 19:02:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 17:19:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-06 13:30:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 14:51:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 09:30:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 17:35:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 17:09:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 06:55:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 21:00:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 17:01:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 14:33:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 11:21:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 05:26:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-06 15:12:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 19:11:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 16:52:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 20:06:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 14:50:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-05-05 11:10:15 -0500 | Rating Details |