Birdwatch Note
2025-02-25 07:08:09 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - the fact that their net worth is shared with their spouse in any fraction, large or small, is irrelevant. It is very possible that their spouse directly benefited from their role in office, which should at minimum, be investigated.
Written by C27DA62D789180FC01F812F09E794BB884FC474E3D55012268824D95B1400C1C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1893487580970107188
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1894283222865121716
- noteId - 1894283222865121716
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C27DA62D789180FC01F812F09E794BB884FC474E3D55012268824D95B1400C1C
- createdAtMillis - 1740467289069
- tweetId - 1893487580970107188
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - the fact that their net worth is shared with their spouse in any fraction, large or small, is irrelevant. It is very possible that their spouse directly benefited from their role in office, which should at minimum, be investigated.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-28 14:37:35 -0600 | Rating Details |