Birdwatch Note
2025-02-23 06:06:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
適切にデザインされた研究では流産は増えていません https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trad093 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.014 自然流産率は約15％で、これが38倍になると570%となり荒唐無稽です https://www.jsog.or.jp/citizen/5707/ 当該論文によるとVAERSのデータを利用したとのことです https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/are-covid-19-vaccines-in-pregnancy-as-safe-and-effective-as-the-medical-industrial-complex-claim-part-i/ しかし、VAERSは誰でもできる自発的報告に依存しており、また、分母のデータがないためバイアスが生じます(p.9,12) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10601000/000776374.pdf よって、発症率の計算に使えないVAERSのデータを利用したことでおかしな結果になったと推測できます。 掲載誌もハゲタカ出版の疑いがあります https://x.com/atsushimiyahara/status/1893506839134027915 編集長や複数の部門責任者を兼任する人物は怪しげな主張を繰り返しています https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/editorial-board/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lyons-Weiler
Written by EE7192EF0B1C47D8A3430C3E070DA2A0BFAA58717F9133404318E9D7666B1A00
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1893422122812481604
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1893542924824305849
- noteId - 1893542924824305849
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EE7192EF0B1C47D8A3430C3E070DA2A0BFAA58717F9133404318E9D7666B1A00 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740290788261
- tweetId - 1893422122812481604
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 適切にデザインされた研究では流産は増えていません https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trad093 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.014 自然流産率は約15％で、これが38倍になると570%となり荒唐無稽です https://www.jsog.or.jp/citizen/5707/ 当該論文によるとVAERSのデータを利用したとのことです https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/are-covid-19-vaccines-in-pregnancy-as-safe-and-effective-as-the-medical-industrial-complex-claim-part-i/ しかし、VAERSは誰でもできる自発的報告に依存しており、また、分母のデータがないためバイアスが生じます(p.9,12) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10601000/000776374.pdf よって、発症率の計算に使えないVAERSのデータを利用したことでおかしな結果になったと推測できます。 掲載誌もハゲタカ出版の疑いがあります https://x.com/atsushimiyahara/status/1893506839134027915 編集長や複数の部門責任者を兼任する人物は怪しげな主張を繰り返しています https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/editorial-board/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lyons-Weiler
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-25 00:13:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 21:07:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 04:33:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 03:07:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 02:43:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 01:59:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 01:07:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 00:47:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 00:21:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 16:03:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 10:20:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 07:47:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 04:44:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 04:28:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 03:49:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 03:24:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 02:42:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 02:22:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 02:03:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 01:53:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 00:59:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 00:50:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 00:32:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 00:19:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 00:16:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 00:08:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 00:32:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 22:33:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 06:45:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 05:55:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 03:37:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 02:21:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 01:19:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 01:19:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 01:05:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-23 00:27:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-26 04:28:32 -0600 | Rating Details |