Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-02-22 11:53:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

DEI is not inherently illegal. DEI programs must be carefully structured to align with civil rights laws, but they are not automatically in violation of the Civil Rights Act. Courts evaluate specific policies on a case-by-case basis. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf https://www.justice.gov/crt/fcs/TitleVI https://www.harvard.edu/admissionscase/2023/06/29/supreme-court-decision/

Written by 3CBB84A2A798F1B345192C9DA7687082C5197E7AF6A0834C0A6C504C5CCB9D87
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1893267922300137746
• noteId - 1893267922300137746
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 3CBB84A2A798F1B345192C9DA7687082C5197E7AF6A0834C0A6C504C5CCB9D87
• createdAtMillis - 1740225222550
• tweetId - 1893111055007580410
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• DEI is not inherently illegal. DEI programs must be carefully structured to align with civil rights laws, but they are not automatically in violation of the Civil Rights Act. Courts evaluate specific policies on a case-by-case basis. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf https://www.justice.gov/crt/fcs/TitleVI https://www.harvard.edu/admissionscase/2023/06/29/supreme-court-decision/