Birdwatch Note
2025-02-16 03:51:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The paper that claimed that Gunung Padand was 27,000 years ago was retracted for factual errors. The age generally accepted by archeologists is between the 2nd and 6th centuries CE, much later than the pyramid at Giza. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunung_Padang https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.1932
Written by 78BA19D591D036C99F26F6D6593D084A85DC6EA7F8A708F3CA8448E0343E55B1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1890961801233289309
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1890972148505682249
- noteId - 1890972148505682249
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 78BA19D591D036C99F26F6D6593D084A85DC6EA7F8A708F3CA8448E0343E55B1
- createdAtMillis - 1739677867425
- tweetId - 1890961801233289309
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The paper that claimed that Gunung Padand was 27,000 years ago was retracted for factual errors. The age generally accepted by archeologists is between the 2nd and 6th centuries CE, much later than the pyramid at Giza. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunung_Padang https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.1932
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-16 12:03:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 03:54:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 03:54:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 03:48:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 03:48:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 02:23:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 00:46:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 00:15:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 00:14:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 00:09:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:50:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:25:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:13:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:11:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:58:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:55:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:50:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:36:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:18:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:15:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 22:06:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 21:59:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 01:47:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 01:32:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 00:08:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 00:05:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:29:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:22:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:19:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:08:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:04:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 12:10:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 03:20:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 23:12:29 -0600 | Rating Details |