Birdwatch Note
2025-02-15 17:48:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
実際は、イベルメクチンやHCQの新型コロナ患者の臨床指標の改善への有効性は、ランダム化比較試験のメタ解析でも検出されていません。 イベルメクチン https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/6/1022/6310839?login=false https://journals.lww.com/aptm/Fulltext/2023/16010/Efficacy_and_safety_of_ivermectin_in_patients_with.2.aspx HCQ https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/12/10/2206 ランダム化比較試験のメタアナリシスはもっとも、エビデンスレベルが高いものです。 https://medical.nikkeibp.co.jp/leaf/all/cancernavi/series/kenkyu/201905/560545.html そのため、こうした有効性が認められていないのは当然の事であり、動画は誤解を招くものです。
Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1890700426586063111
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1890820454698582293
- noteId - 1890820454698582293
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739641700802
- tweetId - 1890700426586063111
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 実際は、イベルメクチンやHCQの新型コロナ患者の臨床指標の改善への有効性は、ランダム化比較試験のメタ解析でも検出されていません。 イベルメクチン https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/6/1022/6310839?login=false https://journals.lww.com/aptm/Fulltext/2023/16010/Efficacy_and_safety_of_ivermectin_in_patients_with.2.aspx HCQ https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/12/10/2206 ランダム化比較試験のメタアナリシスはもっとも、エビデンスレベルが高いものです。 https://medical.nikkeibp.co.jp/leaf/all/cancernavi/series/kenkyu/201905/560545.html そのため、こうした有効性が認められていないのは当然の事であり、動画は誤解を招くものです。
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-16 14:25:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 19:28:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 18:42:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 17:59:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 17:04:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 16:59:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 16:28:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 16:23:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 14:56:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 13:07:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 01:53:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 20:46:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 20:09:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 16:56:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 16:42:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-15 16:30:52 -0600 | Rating Details |