Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-02-08 04:42:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no evidence to prove Mehmed II ever bought the church. “there is no historical evidence of this [sale], and the ‘purchase document’ circulating as proof is a random page of the trust charter that mentions nothing about purchase.” https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-134/the-hagia-sophia-case/ See also: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1180/1453-the-fall-of-constantinople/ https://www.misbar.com/en/factcheck/2020/07/16/sultan-mehmed-ii-never-purchased-hagia-sophia

Written by 8ED3D91E5C0E35D6A03121FF0F2A6211D54B54703BA8CDC709DDDA32870D99C6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1887689396545056883

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1888085969569513970
  • noteId - 1888085969569513970
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8ED3D91E5C0E35D6A03121FF0F2A6211D54B54703BA8CDC709DDDA32870D99C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1738989748744
  • tweetId - 1887689396545056883
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no evidence to prove Mehmed II ever bought the church. “there is no historical evidence of this [sale], and the ‘purchase document’ circulating as proof is a random page of the trust charter that mentions nothing about purchase.” https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-134/the-hagia-sophia-case/ See also: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1180/1453-the-fall-of-constantinople/ https://www.misbar.com/en/factcheck/2020/07/16/sultan-mehmed-ii-never-purchased-hagia-sophia

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-02-08 16:52:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 12:03:33 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 03:56:12 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-07 23:04:52 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 06:44:48 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 01:11:32 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-07 23:33:52 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 08:19:21 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 02:21:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 02:18:20 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 00:38:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-08 00:19:55 -0600 Rating Details