Birdwatch Note
2025-02-06 01:43:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN I don’t think we need a CN for semantics like this. other than a year discrepancy, there isn’t a need for a note
Written by 75740A9E8D0BA6AFC8206BF15CE1D9E7B09A66863E0F3211E5CCE2C2CBC35D03
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1887082435340292436
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1887316276218937761
- noteId - 1887316276218937761
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 75740A9E8D0BA6AFC8206BF15CE1D9E7B09A66863E0F3211E5CCE2C2CBC35D03
- createdAtMillis - 1738806239548
- tweetId - 1887082435340292436
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN I don’t think we need a CN for semantics like this. other than a year discrepancy, there isn’t a need for a note
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-06 05:14:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 03:40:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 01:18:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 20:53:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 11:08:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 04:29:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 01:10:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 23:51:55 -0600 | Rating Details |