Birdwatch Note
2025-02-04 18:26:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
While USAID may have initially been set up in good faith and had some projects with intended funding outcomes, there are questions about numerous items paid for without full transparency to the public that appear corrupt. The inquiry is valid and post is an opinion.
Written by D341B47817529B69B5DC5AD6787276019A30E742D3B3797E7164132ED7EBBE22
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1886780107269833142
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1886843689516814778
- noteId - 1886843689516814778
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D341B47817529B69B5DC5AD6787276019A30E742D3B3797E7164132ED7EBBE22
- createdAtMillis - 1738693566098
- tweetId - 1886780107269833142
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- While USAID may have initially been set up in good faith and had some projects with intended funding outcomes, there are questions about numerous items paid for without full transparency to the public that appear corrupt. The inquiry is valid and post is an opinion.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-04 19:03:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 18:54:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 17:11:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 16:49:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 16:17:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 16:16:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 16:10:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 14:05:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 13:21:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 13:02:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 07:56:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 07:34:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 07:33:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 07:03:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 06:06:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 05:34:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 03:06:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 02:47:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 01:55:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 01:09:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 01:06:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 01:02:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 22:29:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 17:57:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 14:51:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 12:12:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 05:54:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 02:14:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 23:56:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 23:44:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 23:20:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 15:49:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 21:03:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 20:02:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 19:37:47 -0600 | Rating Details |