Birdwatch Note
2025-02-04 13:44:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Starmers “curry night” was well within the laws set out by the government of the time. Whereas Johnson with “partygate” was breaking the law of the time. This has been done to death now and is easily researched online. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/beergate-partygate-fine-difference-starmer-b2118844.html
Written by 3970FC8AB3ED2C06C59A19B48170D235F2FC4D4722B6BB9C6250780260597E7C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1886453710974583109
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1886772719108112890
- noteId - 1886772719108112890
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3970FC8AB3ED2C06C59A19B48170D235F2FC4D4722B6BB9C6250780260597E7C
- createdAtMillis - 1738676645434
- tweetId - 1886453710974583109
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Starmers “curry night” was well within the laws set out by the government of the time. Whereas Johnson with “partygate” was breaking the law of the time. This has been done to death now and is easily researched online. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/beergate-partygate-fine-difference-starmer-b2118844.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-04 13:41:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 11:11:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 10:32:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 10:10:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 09:40:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 08:41:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 08:23:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 07:56:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 13:13:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 11:27:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-04 08:31:11 -0600 | Rating Details |