Birdwatch Note
2025-02-02 20:19:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Note is needed: 1: a wrong identification is justification for a CN 2: the “just a question bro” defense doesn’t work if the OP is assuming something. Ex: “why did you eat a cheeseburger for lunch?” If I didn’t eat a cheeseburger for lunch that question is based on factual errors
Written by B7A7ECE854F6EECF5EC1F4127C65F2BC5603AFD52B0BEE94DC2B056F86A06C81
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885955084267249747
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1886147333605482795
- noteId - 1886147333605482795
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B7A7ECE854F6EECF5EC1F4127C65F2BC5603AFD52B0BEE94DC2B056F86A06C81
- createdAtMillis - 1738527541911
- tweetId - 1885955084267249747
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Note is needed: 1: a wrong identification is justification for a CN 2: the “just a question bro” defense doesn’t work if the OP is assuming something. Ex: “why did you eat a cheeseburger for lunch?” If I didn’t eat a cheeseburger for lunch that question is based on factual errors
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-02 17:54:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 17:42:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:10:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:08:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:58:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:56:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:38:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:34:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:31:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:27:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:27:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:22:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:11:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:02:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 10:38:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 05:23:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 03:48:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 20:39:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 20:22:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:33:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:17:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:03:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 14:59:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 14:30:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 10:32:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 20:49:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 20:45:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 18:15:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:18:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:08:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:03:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:09:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 14:37:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 06:41:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 04:43:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 17:30:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:23:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:48:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 15:15:46 -0600 | Rating Details |